Our lunch, our sacrifice: North trying negative reinforcement
February 19, 2014
A forty-five minute lunch, promised to us in exchange for a better attendance record. Sounds like a pretty nice deal, right? It’s almost convincing enough to cover up the corruption behind the ordeal in the first place. Almost, but not quite.
Two years ago, the idea of a forty-five minute lunch was implemented, with a release time of 2:45 to compensate for our extra time. Before then, the release time had been ten minutes earlier, and our lunches failed to subsist.
As of this school year, our lengthened lunch has been stripped from our schedule, and our time to eat has been crippled. Previously, this may not have been as big of a deal. Unfortunately for us, the enormous size of the freshman class this year has done well to devastate our time in the cafeteria, and create lines that make you physically older by the time you’ve left.
This, combined with the excess amount of students forced to stay behind at the school due to their new inability to eat fast food, leaves us with a major surplus of hungry students who are forced to find a little breathing room in the cafeteria. It becomes apparent that the time allocated to the number of students just isn’t enough.
That’s not where the corruption begins, however. After the removal of our longer lunch, the release time of 2:45 remained, which had only been put into effect for compensation. This left us with moronic new release times for other classes, such as 9:02, and 10:29. All this succeeds in doing is creating a confusing schedule, and an irritated student populace.
After the completion of semester one with a short lunch, the North High administration came out with an ultimatum. The dust has somewhat settled, and North High has begun their attempt at turning a longer lunch into positive reinforcement. This might be all well and good for the freshman who weren’t around to remember previous privileges, but everyone else knows just how pathetic this is.
What we are in fact being given, is negative reinforcement that was poorly disguised as a reward. Until our release time is pulled back to a time more reasonable than 2:45, this “reward” is nothing but privileges we are already paying for with our time.
So what are we left with? A school administration that cut us down from the knees, and offered to help us back up in exchange for school wide changes.
The results will be very reflective of this; a promise to give us what we had already had before is the idea of inexperienced authority. It’s obvious that because of the loss of principal Matt Smith, North lost its ability to compromise.
Student of NHS • Feb 24, 2014 at 11:00 AM
I agreed, because many of the student alway come late in the morning and of that 5 minutes extra more student can go to their first or fifth block on time.
Mayra • Feb 24, 2014 at 10:53 AM
I think we should have a longer lunch because 30 min it not enough . The people who do to out to eat come back late because the need more time to eat n drive back to school. I think it’s better if we have a longer lunch time also because some people can use that extra time to relax or finish any hw.
Edson nolasco • Feb 24, 2014 at 10:51 AM
I agree 100% with this statement. I think we should get a longer lunch time and get out of school earlier.
Anonymous • Feb 24, 2014 at 10:51 AM
Having a 45 minute lunch, I think is a good idea. I agree that that time allocated to the number of students just isn’t enough because not all students have enough time to eat their lunch and also many students don’t get to class on time because they don’t have enough time to finish eating.
Willimena Siah • Feb 24, 2014 at 10:50 AM
I agreed we should have a forty five minutes of lunch because after I am done eating I like to take a break before going to class, taking to friends and geting some work done.
Anonymous • Feb 24, 2014 at 10:44 AM
I think we should have 45 minute lunch because we need more time to eat. I mean if some people are causing it punish them not everybody.
Odyssey • Feb 24, 2014 at 10:42 AM
I think we should earn the 45 minute lunch because if they just give it to us we will never learn we still go to our classes late and there would be more fights
Adan Guerrero • Feb 24, 2014 at 10:39 AM
I also agree that North has a bizarre schedule. How North shortens our lunch but yet we still get out of school much later then any middle school or high school in the DMPS. Here soon, North staff and principle needs to find away to gain repect of their students and maybe improvising our schedule, people will actually go to class. It’s a step which we need to take to improve by next year.
Jocelyn • Feb 21, 2014 at 11:19 AM
I believe with your opinion, and we should have a longer time to eat our lunch.
Jocelyn • Feb 21, 2014 at 11:16 AM
I do believe our school schedule is pretty confusing and difficult to understand. We should fix it and also have our forty-five minute lunch. Students need more time to eat their lunch, and to get to class on time.